posted by
owlfish at 10:39am on 11/03/2010 under the art of reading
Amazon recommends me Wolf Hall, by Hilary Mantel. So too have various friends via LJ posts, recently. Amazon, however, unlike those friends, I suspect, recommends it on the basis of my having once bought The Oxford Companion to Wine.
At
fjm's recommendation, I read Shards of Honor a couple of years ago. It gave me no incentive to keep reading the Vorkosigan series. Neither did reading excerpts from the companion volume, which I browsed last year as a Hugo-nominated non-fiction book. It was the cumulative recommendation of friends who were particular Bujold fans which led me to request Barrayar from the library. It has that same inner stillness, despite all the action, that Shards of Honor had, but with a much more coherent plot to hold it all together. It really is quite good, for quite a number of reasons, particularly its compelling doing-what-needs-to-be-done in a pragmatic way approach to resolution. I liked it enough that I recommended it to C., who has now also read it. He's not sure it passes the Bechdel test, however.
I'm always charmed that one of the libraries in Essex with good science fiction collection, and thus one from which my requested books sometimes come, is the Tiptree library.
The problem with being a completist about finishing books is that I rarely feel I can put my academic reading down on my list of books-I-have-read, unless I have really read the book entirely, all chapters, all appendices, and made good inroads on the notes and bibliography. Research-reading, excerpting chapters and relevant selections, is pratical and necessary - but doesn't come with that moment's satisfaction of feeling the book is really, truly Read.
At
I'm always charmed that one of the libraries in Essex with good science fiction collection, and thus one from which my requested books sometimes come, is the Tiptree library.
The problem with being a completist about finishing books is that I rarely feel I can put my academic reading down on my list of books-I-have-read, unless I have really read the book entirely, all chapters, all appendices, and made good inroads on the notes and bibliography. Research-reading, excerpting chapters and relevant selections, is pratical and necessary - but doesn't come with that moment's satisfaction of feeling the book is really, truly Read.
(no subject)
Glancing over them now, I'm not at all sure any of them pass clearly. The later ones are mostly narrated over Miles's shoulder, but not exclusively, so there's no out there.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
At the end of the last book we left Miles with new-born children. I don't know whether Bujold will ever publish another book about him, but I will certainly read it if she does.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I introduced C. to the Bechdel test a few weeks ago, so we've been talking about it, and what might and might not count, quite a bit lately.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
I recommend Wolf Hall very highly; I loved it. I also adore the Miles books - like Coth, I think Mirror Dance and Komarr are the best, and A Civil Campaign, which I'm sure you would love.
(the Little Princess sequel is Hilary McKay, not Mantell)
(no subject)
(no subject)
On the other hand I have a tendency to read some academic books of interest (sometimes of tangential interest) cover-to-cover. This is a trifle ineffective, but I've never felt entirely comfortable with the opportunistic reading that academic research unfortunately.
(no subject)
Not an example of pleasure reading per se, but a good reason for reading around when possible: it's been a revelation to me how much media studies has in common with history of technology. I had no idea. It also means I'm now getting the theoretical underpinnings and historiography for approaches I've been taking for granted to years.