Chalk is a kind of limestone, chalk such as the chalk of the Chalk Group, the stone underlying much of southern England, under the Channel, the Netherlands, parts of the North Sea, and down into Champagne. It's also the name of a town in Kent, Chalk, reading about which, thanks to a prompt from
Later, yesterday, after seeing the North-West Passage exhibit at the National Maritime Museum (CanCon dealt with for the week), and coming back home to burn things, we sipped on a sparkling wine which proclaimed itself argillaceous. Today's lime-browsing reassured me that not knowing how to translate it said nothing about my French and everything about my ignorance of stratigraphy. Argillaceous rocks have clay content. Limestone can be argillaceous, as is the argillaceous chalk marl through which the Channel Tunnel was dug.
Marl is lime-rich mud. In French, it is marne, from which the river and the department in France are surely named - for that's where Champagne, of the chalk-rich soil and sparkling wines is.
Speaking of limes - one of the other kinds - we also wondered why yuzu has become such a trendy fruit in chocolate.
(no subject)
(no subject)
Here's what the OED offers:
Biscuit!
a. OF. 12th c. bescoit, 13th c. bescuit, 16th c. biscut, mod.F. biscuit, a common Romanic word (= Pr. bescueit, Cat. bescuyt, Sp. bizcocho, Pg. biscuto, It. biscotto) on L. type *biscoctum (panem), bread ‘twice baked,’ from the original mode of preparation. The regular form in Eng. from 16th to 18th c. was bisket, as still pronounced; the current biscuit is a senseless adoption of the mod.Fr. spelling, without the Fr. pronunciation.]
Re: Biscuit!
Re: Biscuit!
I'm rather charmed to see "biskit" as the moderately-recent historical form. LOLcats: Instructive source of historical English
why yuzu?
Actually, I think it's because it was a relatively unknown citrus in Europe and the West, until someone asked about it on a sushi-eating trip to Japan. So for a while they added it to everything--chocolate's happened to stick for a while. Yuzu's also big in dressings.
(I'm not so into the yuzu, actually. Now, sudachi....)
I have yet to sight the yuzu KitKat, if they ever made it. (Ah, I miss the KitKat of Japan.)
Re: why yuzu?
http://www.typetive.com/candyblog/item/japanese_kitkats_yuzu_red_bean_soup/
I don't know sudachi (other than having just looked it up). The planet's full of interesting local fruits; I suppose there's always another doomed to be the next fad.
(no subject)
They were rather unmemorable apparently. (Thinking back on it, the yuzu flavor didn't taste very fresh. The Milk Tea KitKats were more appealing for me.)
(no subject)
Chelsea is not, as you might think from the -ea ending, an island; it's one of those Saxon names the Normans got all wrong. If they'd left it alone, it would have been called Chalk-hithe today (or maybe elided to Chelketh, like Lambeth over the river was). I suppose it also had something to do with the trade in chalk from Kent: apparently you can see bits of chalk in the Thames there at low tide.
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Cool. After getting over my initial fantasia on a theme of citrus fruit cottages, I'd assumed that there was a lime storage place in the vicinity akin to a munincipal grit warehouse.
(no subject)