owlfish: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 11:03pm on 19/03/2009
I had a horse phase when I was young - books, Breyer horses, summer camp, riding lessons, but definitely books. I collected the Marguerite Henry novels, some new, some - out of print - in ex-library editions. My sister joined in the phase and our parents treated us to family holidays over several summers to the island of Chincoteague and to a primo Palio, a practice horse race in Siena before the real Palio. The Palio trip was inspired by one of those ex-library copies, of an out-of-print Henry novel, Gaudenzia, Pride of the Palio. Alibris tells me that it was published in 1960 and reprinted in 1967. I don't know which copy I had.

We outgrew the horse phase and eventually I went off to university. My parents gave away my horse books to a young woman, horse-crazy then and horse-crazy still today. It's the only time they've done that, that I know of, given away my books. It was for a good cause, although I felt and sometimes feel nostalgic about them. All those books. All my books. And it was fine, since I haven't felt it urgent to reread them since, although I think about them now and again.

I've been thinking about those books this week.

See, last month, a law came into effect in the US, a good-intentioned law, intended to keep lead toys out of the mouths of children. It applies retroactively, however, and unless a seller pays for the tests - cumulatively expensive - to ensure that an object obviously intended for children is lead-free (if produced in a time when this was a danger), then that seller may not longer sell or give away those products in the US. The law was written for toys, but applies to children's books too - and lead ink was used to print books up until 1985. This means that it's probably no longer legal to sell or give away any children's book in the US printed before 1985 (unless testing is done).

Thrift stores. Second-hand book dealers. Already, faced with unusable stock, a number of them have been stock-dumping, throwing away their supplies to avoid the risk of having a substantial financial penalty slapped on them. The American Library Association is apparently claiming themselves exempt right now, but even if they're allowed to get away with it, they'll still have problems in disposing of books which would previously have been sold off. The relevant enforcement agency has already said it will delay enforcement until February of next year, but stores are already, following official recommendations, getting rid of those books.

This isn't just a danger to the world's residual stock of Gaudenzia, Pride of the Palio (which was, after all, printed in the US and primarily sold there so far as I know). It's a danger is all US stocks of pre-1985 children's books from anywhere at all.

One consolation is that there will certainly be some stock of most of these books which will have ended up in other countries. But it isn't legal for US holders of such books to sell or give those books away, domestically or internationally, if at all obviously intended for children. (Collectors are okay, but hard to prove.)

Articles here and here. Alert from [livejournal.com profile] sammywol.

In other scare-mongering news, the Roquefort tax tripling in the US has been postponed for a month.
There are 22 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] pittenweem.livejournal.com at 11:12pm on 19/03/2009
King of the Wind remains one of my favorite children's books. Though I loved Misty and the stories about her, the story of KotW appealed to me more for some reason.
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 11:19pm on 19/03/2009
At this distance, I'm sorry to say I don't even know which my favorite was. I was using Gaudenzia as an example mostly because I knew I had a pre-1985 copy if, when I got it, it was a well-used ex-library copy. Still, off-hand, I can't locate a printing of King of the Wind from after 1984 - but it had a whole lot of reprints along the way! (Probably thanks to the movie. I didn't know there were Marguerite Henry-based movies!)
Edited Date: 2009-03-19 11:20 pm (UTC)
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 11:24pm on 19/03/2009
Not at all related, but if you haven't seen this video, you really should: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=D2FX9rviEhw
 
posted by [identity profile] stormwindz.livejournal.com at 11:47pm on 19/03/2009
This sounds like it really will be devastating :(:(
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 10:03am on 20/03/2009
I really, really hope it doesn't go through as currently forecast.
 
posted by [identity profile] a-d-medievalist.livejournal.com at 12:51am on 20/03/2009
Oh, my ... I'm not sure which was my fave, although I think it was probably King of the Wind ... the beginning where the horse's boy is fasting for Ramadan, the cat that sleeps on the horse's back, and their adjustments to like in England ... You know, I think that was probably my first exposure to a Muslim character? I must have been about 8.

OTOH, how thrilling when Farfalla got chosen -- by the Wave, wasn't it? and the scary image of the mattresses up on the walls around the piazza? Ooh -- first exposure to Italian, too!

Sorry -- the funny thing is I actually liked Fairfax Downey's horse books even better.
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 10:03am on 20/03/2009
Up until your comment, I was thinking I didn't need to reread any of these. Now, I might...
 
posted by [identity profile] henchminion.livejournal.com at 02:33am on 20/03/2009
Wow, those titles bring me back. My favorite was Mustang: Wild Spirit of the West. I seem to have missed Gaudenzia entirely. It must not have been in my local or school libraries.
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 10:05am on 20/03/2009
With only two editions of Gaudenzia only in the '60s vs. reprints of Mustang at least until 1998, your odds of encountering the latter were much higher!
 
posted by [identity profile] intertext.livejournal.com at 02:47am on 20/03/2009
Oh, I loved Marguerite Henry! But I never encountered Gaudenzie either - I had Mustang: Wild Spirit of the West and the Chincoteague books... and King of the Wind of course. I also liked the one about the fox...
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 10:02am on 20/03/2009
I think Gaudenzia must have been one of the more obscure, given how many editions most of her other books went through - and that one only had two.
(deleted comment)
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 10:01am on 20/03/2009
I'm glad you were able to make do.
(deleted comment)
owlfish: (Labyrinth - Through dangers untold)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 04:44pm on 20/03/2009
So THAT'S why your toe is always broken.
 
posted by [identity profile] jennybeast.livejournal.com at 05:37am on 20/03/2009
ALA is trying to get congress to declare an exception for libraries, at least, and children's books in general if at all possible. It's a big scary thing. Fortunately, I think that even if they do manage to enforce it, there are significant special collections of children's materials all over the country that should be immune -- so hopefully our old favorites won't be destroyed entirely, just, you know, made inaccessible. :P
owlfish: (Vanitas desk)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 10:06am on 20/03/2009
And eventually, the better part of a century from now, they would be out-of-copyright and reproducable in safe ink again so long as copyright isn't extended still further.

But it would be so much easier to just have an out for books, or at least for library books.
 
posted by [identity profile] a-d-medievalist.livejournal.com at 01:21pm on 20/03/2009
or maybe teach kids not to eat books and wash their hands before and after reading?
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 01:34pm on 20/03/2009
Mm. Tasty books.
ext_27060: Sumer is icomen in; llude sing cucu! (Default)
posted by [identity profile] rymenhild.livejournal.com at 03:54pm on 20/03/2009
What awful and ridiculous stupidity. D:
 
posted by [identity profile] printperson.livejournal.com at 08:46pm on 20/03/2009
Are you sure that we gave away the books? There are immense numbers of your books on your bookshelves and in boxes in the basement.
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 09:22pm on 20/03/2009
You told me you did over the phone and I haven't seen them since. They went to the Eckhouses. Of cours, I haven't gone looking, having been told they weren't there; but they aren't anywhere obvious if they are.
 
posted by [identity profile] zcat-abroad.livejournal.com at 11:16pm on 21/03/2009
I, too, was an avid reader of horse books, but don't know of any of these. On the other hand, there was the Australian set of "The Silver Brumby", "The Silver Brumby's Daughter" etc. which I loved to bits.

And I still wish I had had the chance to grow up on a farm and go to gymkhanas and just ride everywhere. In my next life, perhaps?
 
posted by [identity profile] moon-custafer.livejournal.com at 11:39pm on 21/03/2009
I'd heard about this via the craft community (also affected by this - anyone making stuff for kids has to send all materials for testing at their own expense); but hadn't thought about the old-books implications. Aargh.

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31