Feasting in the Northern Oceans of Medieval Academia. Theology : comments.
Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10 |
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
(no subject)
But I don't really think it's a question of time travel, per se. The sort of God we're talking about must exist outside time and therefore perceives every instant, from the beginning of the universe to the end, simultaneously. Without that problematic moving backwards through time thing, free will is again not compromised.
(no subject)
If you use the Many Worlds theory, the same argument holds. If he can whiz up and down all possible timelines, then all possible actions are predetermined (and occur) in some sense. So again no free will. Breaks the rules.
The sort of God
I don't think that is the sort of God we are talking about. I could be wrong, the "outside of time" bit isn't in the Bible. Doesn't the Bible just say that he's eternal, and kind of imply by his actions and speach that he's experiencing time linearly too?
(no subject)
As for the type of God under discussion, I'm hardly a Bible scholar, being cheerfully agnostic myself, but while the Good Book might imply God experiences time as mortals do, I've seen modern philosophers and theologians discuss Divine nature in the terms I was suggesting.