posted by
owlfish at 11:47pm on 11/04/2007 under the art of reading
I too kept track of the books I read for my Specialist Exam (no Major Fields in my department). I've kept track of books for reading programs in elementary and secondary school. I read all of the Newberry Award books as of 5th grade. I've always liked the idea of keeping track of books, but never really done it. I wonder if it's a combination of my historical and accumulative instincts to desire to the information, even if I don't retain it. Does it matter if I've read a book if I can't remember what it's about?
A few people commented on the book records poll to observe that they didn't see the point in keeping track of all the books they'd ever read. Is it a genre of life diary? Are people who keep track of books more or less likely to keep track of other things, like movies? Is it a form of collecting things which doesn't take up much space? Is it a tally for pride, each book a notch? Early life habit, once established, never altered?
For those of you who do so, why do you keep track (or want to keep track) of the books you read?
A few people commented on the book records poll to observe that they didn't see the point in keeping track of all the books they'd ever read. Is it a genre of life diary? Are people who keep track of books more or less likely to keep track of other things, like movies? Is it a form of collecting things which doesn't take up much space? Is it a tally for pride, each book a notch? Early life habit, once established, never altered?
For those of you who do so, why do you keep track (or want to keep track) of the books you read?
(no subject)
so many templates that its so easy to say o I'll just do it for the hell of it?
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
Of course, as Plato so wisely pointed out, writing things down atrophies the memory rather than improving it. But I'd still prefer that to the void. :)
(no subject)
(no subject)
(no subject)
However, remembering plots doesn't always mean I remember how good the writing was. So, I really would like to keep track of good authors so when it comes to purchasing something in an airport, I know whether the book is going to be a keeper or a beg-the-used-bookstore-owner-to-please-buy-it-book.
It just struck me that one way of keeping track would be to review the book for Amazon.com or some other site, so I could actually keep track online without losing my list!
(no subject)
The initial reason was that I was in a literary APA where we talked about books so it was useful to know what I had actually read, my memory being what it is!
Nowdays I don't really need to keep the list, but I find it quite interesting. It helps with writing the Vector 'Review of the year' piece, and the longer version I usually put up on LJ.
We also tend to compare year-on-year totals, though
But, honestly? I do it just because I like to!
(no subject)
(no subject)
I do recognise that the important books should stay in your memory unprompted, and that the ones you forget you've read by definition can't have been very good. But then again, when it turns out that the memories of them which you would otherwise have lost can actually be prompted back into existence by a pretty small trigger (say a 100-word LJ write-up), it seems to me to be worth doing - a point which applies to keeping a journal generally, and not just to recording books.
(no subject)