Feasting in the Northern Oceans of Medieval Academia. Preparation : comments.
| Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
|
8
|
9
|
10 |
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
The best defense...
I had three examiners in my (UK) defense: the external, who was a new professor from York who'd just come into academe after a distinguished career in industry, the internal, who was in my field (CS) but not my area, and an internal chair (also a professor) due to OU regulations on the examining panel needing a certain number of defenses under their belts.
They started off by asking me to give a summary presentation of the thesis, which was a good way of getting me settled into the defense, then graduated from relatively gentle questioning to several quite probing questions. I had a couple of times where I had to think for several minutes before answering. Only one gee-my-thesis-has-a-gaping-hole-in-it moment, and it quickly became apparent that the hole wasn't that big.