owlfish: (Vanitas desk)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 05:47pm on 28/02/2005
Thank you to everyone who competed and voted in this game of Humiliation! The race was an extremely tight one for most of the weekend, with Hamlet, The Hobbit, and Lord of the Rings within one or two points of each other. In the end, a few last minute voters who'd only read The Hobbit (of these three) added in their votes, with the prequel to the Lord of the Rings squeaking ahead to a four point victory. This is particularly impressive given that an amazing sixty-nine people voted!

Congratulations to [livejournal.com profile] kashmera, the winner of this weekend's round of Humiliation! Your prize is a homework assignment: go forth and read The Hobbit. I can even send you a copy, a much better reward for winning than, say, a humiliating little logo advertising your win.

Congratulations also to [livejournal.com profile] oursin and [livejournal.com profile] momiji, who gave [livejournal.com profile] kashmera very stiff competition along the way.

Commiserations to [livejournal.com profile] suffisaunce, who ended up with the fewest votes for Small World. If that's as popular a book you can come up with that you've never read, you must be very well-read indeed, despite your protestations to the contrary.

Among voters, [livejournal.com profile] beeswing read an amazing sixteen of the entrants, while [livejournal.com profile] wakarusa and [livejournal.com profile] chickenfeet2003 read fifteen of them. I counted rather quickly, so hopefully I didn't leave anyone out of the best-read voters list.

Given my own interests, I know a disproportionately high number of medievalists and science fiction/fantasy fans, all of whom are likely to have read Tolkien's most popular works. This is also why The Canterbury Tales ([livejournal.com profile] chickenfeet2003) was a serious contender in the early hours of voting, trailing the leaders by only a vote or so for the first day. Sir Gawain and the Green Knight ([livejournal.com profile] lemur_catta) might also have done better than usual for this reason.

Teamwork seems somewhat self-defeating in a game like this. By choosing a book that someone else has already chosen, you're sacrificing one of your potential votes before the game has even begun. That said, I was expecting Pride and Prejudice to do somewhat better than it did.

If I were to run another edition of this game, I would
- Wait at least a month before doing so.
- Would disqualify the top three books from this time around.
- Might do a more focused thematic one - speculative fiction, maybe.

It'd be interesting to see a movie version of this game too - but I'm not going to run it. I have seen a rather small percentage of classic movies.
There are 9 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] kashmera.livejournal.com at 10:55pm on 28/02/2005
Prepares to begin acceptance speech...tears in eyes, etc. (and that's just the audience, currently cringing in the aisles).
 
posted by [identity profile] easterbunny.livejournal.com at 11:37pm on 28/02/2005
I want to play again!
 
posted by [identity profile] forthright.livejournal.com at 11:50pm on 28/02/2005
I definitely vote for a speculative fiction game. At least then I can have a reasonable shot at having read more than a handful of the contestants!

 
posted by [identity profile] tsutanai.livejournal.com at 09:37am on 01/03/2005
Whereas I'd do worse in terms of having read them, I suspect. Ah well.
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 09:32pm on 01/03/2005
Children's Lit is another category I was thinking of. Anime might be fun too - I don't know manga well enough to do a round of that, though.
 
posted by [identity profile] momiji.livejournal.com at 12:22am on 01/03/2005
Woot!

I'm in the top three :)
 
posted by [identity profile] of-remedye.livejournal.com at 02:50am on 01/03/2005
Commiserations to suffisaunce

Haaaaaaaaaaaaaaa. Now why am I not surprised? It probably relates to the pathology where all of the other grad students are, like, really smart and they all spend all their time sipping tea and talking about David Lodge novels, nay, living them, while I try to remember where in the reading room they keep the DMA ...

yeah.
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 09:32pm on 01/03/2005
Well... I haven't read it either.
 
posted by [identity profile] of-remedye.livejournal.com at 07:35am on 02/03/2005
So we're all playing this game, and none of us has read the book. ::is way too dull to draw some analogy with grad school ... but is tempted::

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31