owlfish: (Default)
Add MemoryShare This Entry
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 02:46pm on 18/02/2005
The BBC has been wording its headlines in terms of questions more and more lately (or maybe I've just been noticing it more lately). I know its purpose is to engage its readers, to make them wonder, "Is Healthcare at risk?" or "Will Kyoto make a difference?".

But that's not why I read the news: I read the news to find out what's actually happening in the world. Looking through the BBC's Entertainment news section, I don't see a single question asked by today's headlines. The Beeb is decisive that Will Smith definitely will be hosting an Aids Benefit, and that Star Trek fans really are fighting to save a show. For some reason, it's easier to be assertive on the subject of movie stars and t.v. shows than it is on things like greenhouse gas, politically sensitive issues.

And so I would like to submit a handful of today's BBC headlines to you and have a more decisive answer to each. The questions are copy/pasted from the BBC's various news pages. The linked articles don't necessarily have the same headline as the summary version, and you don't need to read them.

I'm not looking for right or wrong answers - I'm looking for decisiveness. Just pick something. It's more than the BBC is doing.

[Poll #440048]
There are 12 comments on this entry. (Reply.)
 
posted by [identity profile] kashmera.livejournal.com at 07:47pm on 18/02/2005
That's tricky. I kept wanting to say 'it depends...'
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 07:50pm on 18/02/2005
No relative perspectives! No contextualized answers! I want commitment from my headlines, even if I disagree with them.

And anyways, what kind of a headline is "Fashion victim?" when it's not shown with a picture or other context? It's uninformative.
 
posted by [identity profile] kashmera.livejournal.com at 07:57pm on 18/02/2005
Even though I'd read the article before I couldn't remember what it was about - which just shows how 'blah' it was.

I decided for each question to put it into a specific context because otherwise I couldn't answer it. So:
#1 and #4 - me
#2 - non-geeks
#3 - the UK in general
#5 - schoolkids in a western society

That was my way of being decisive - otherwise I could just have been random...
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 08:52pm on 18/02/2005
Your professional ethics are getting in the way of dividing the world up into black-and-white answers. But I appreciate your honesty.
 
posted by [identity profile] kashmera.livejournal.com at 09:08pm on 18/02/2005
I was about to write a reply on behavioural statistics (something I'm involved in a lot right now), but decided that I'm working too hard and that wasn't really the point...
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 09:14pm on 18/02/2005
I'd be quite interested it in reading it, if you do ever decide to write it up. Don't make extra work for yourself. In every other context, I am much more interested in the grey areas of these sorts of things. But if the answer's grey, I don't want the news offering a b+w question to define the subject.
 
posted by [identity profile] kashmera.livejournal.com at 07:58pm on 18/02/2005
Except the one about chips - that was obvious.
 
posted by [identity profile] lemur-catta.livejournal.com at 10:54pm on 18/02/2005
I said no just to be contrary
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 11:20pm on 18/02/2005
I was wondering if it would be a 100 percent sweep.
 
posted by [identity profile] tisiphone.livejournal.com at 07:56pm on 18/02/2005
We didn't have a "both" option!
owlfish: (Default)
posted by [personal profile] owlfish at 08:51pm on 18/02/2005
The BBC headline specified "or".
 
posted by [identity profile] sioneva.livejournal.com at 08:59am on 19/02/2005
I confess to feeling a bit disappointed in the Beeb recently myself--I feel as if they're really dumbing down the quality of their reporting/programming to compete with such *stunning* news programmes as ITV/Granada and Channel 5.

And if they're not asking questions, they're ranting about the epidemic of childhood obesity. I don't think they let a week go by without harping on it.

October

SunMonTueWedThuFriSat
1
 
2
 
3
 
4
 
5
 
6
 
7
 
8
 
9
 
10 11
 
12
 
13
 
14
 
15
 
16
 
17
 
18
 
19
 
20
 
21
 
22
 
23
 
24
 
25
 
26
 
27
 
28
 
29
 
30
 
31